Skip to content
HomeServices

Professional blockchain engineering at institutional scale.

Focused engagements in blockchain development, smart contract audit, and security consulting — named owners, signed reports, no ambiguity.

Built for what comes next.

Blockchain Development

Custom distributed ledger technology and public protocol integrations engineered for institutional reliability.

Blockchain Development engagements at Mozaca are not treated as greenfield experiments. They are scoped as production systems with chain choice, operational handoff, monitoring, and failure modes reviewed before implementation.

Every engagement names the owner responsible for the build, the architecture decision record that documents the choice, and the operational handover that follows. We expect to be in the room when the failure modes are discussed, not just when the demo is run.

What we deliver

  • Private and consortium chain architecture with operational handover.
  • Public protocol integrations across EVM, Solana, and Cosmos.
  • Bridge, oracle, and indexing infrastructure with monitoring built in.
  • Wallet, staking, and dApp development with security baked into the spec.

Best fit: Best when you need a chain integration that will still be running in 18 months — and an engineering team that takes responsibility for that.

Discuss this engagement
mozacaWorkspace / Digital assetsSample dataACYOUR WORKSPACEOverviewAccountsConversionsTransactionsApprovalsReportsOPERATIONSDeveloper toolsSettingsAcme workspaceWORKSPACE OVERVIEWYour value. Connected.+ New conversionTotal holdings$284,650.00Across approved asset routesAvailable to convert$218,400.00USD equivalent · samplePending settlement$66,250.004 transfers in progressSettlement activityLAST 7 DAYS20k10k0MonTueWedThuFriSatSunConnected routesUSDC → USD$12,400ApprovedUSDT → KES$8,250In reviewUSD → Wallet$3,680ApprovedRecent transactionsView all →TXN-08421Merchant settlementBank transfer$4,850.00SettledTXN-08420Stablecoin conversionUSDC → USD$2,160.00Settled
Engineering · illustrative operating context

Smart Contract Audit

Rigorous security reviews ensuring code integrity, preventing exploits, and optimising efficiency.

Smart Contract Audits combine manual review, automated static analysis, fuzzing, and formal verification on critical paths. Each engagement produces a signed report with reproducible findings — the standard for code that will hold real value in production.

Findings are written for the engineer who will fix them. Every issue carries a severity, a reproduction path, and remediation guidance that can be re-tested against the codebase. There is no separate 'consulting' document — the audit report is the operating contract.

What we deliver

  • Manual review with a named lead reviewer.
  • Static analysis, fuzzing, and invariant testing across the codebase.
  • Formal verification on critical paths where assumptions must be provable.
  • Gas profiling and optimisation against measured baselines.

Best fit: Best when the contract will hold meaningful value at launch — and you need a signed report your stakeholders will trust.

Discuss this engagement
mozacaWorkspace / ComplianceSample dataACYOUR WORKSPACEOverviewAccountsPaymentsTransactionsApprovalsReportsOPERATIONSDeveloper toolsSettingsAcme workspaceIDENTITY & POLICYConfidence, before approval.Demo caseACAcme TradingBusiness account · CASE-00284 · Standard reviewVerifiedBusiness identityDocuments reviewedVerified ✓Sanctions screeningReview result attachedClear ✓Transaction limitsConfigured by policyApplied ✓Payment approvalsSeparate maker and checkerEnabled ✓Evidence stays attached to the decision.Reviewer identity · timestamp · policy version · supporting documents · audit export
Assurance · illustrative operating context

Blockchain Security

Comprehensive consulting and threat modelling for decentralised applications and asset ecosystems.

Blockchain Security is the practice of designing systems that fail safely — and responding decisively when they do. Mozaca works alongside teams operating at scale to model threats, harden operational security, manage keys, and run incident response programmes that hold up under pressure.

Security is not a feature checkbox. It is the bar every scoped engagement must clear. Every engagement documents the threat model in writing, names the response owner, and produces runbooks an on-call engineer can actually use.

What we deliver

  • Threat modelling and architecture review with documented assumptions.
  • Operational security and key management designed for production reality.
  • Incident response and post-mortem analysis with runbooks.
  • Continuous monitoring and on-chain telemetry tied to alerting paths.

Best fit: Best when the system is already moving real money and the failure modes need to be modelled before they are tested in production.

Discuss this engagement
mozacaWorkspace / OverviewSample dataACYOUR WORKSPACEOverviewAccountsPaymentsTransactionsApprovalsReportsOPERATIONSDeveloper toolsSettingsAcme workspaceACCOUNTS & BALANCESEvery account. In one place.Separate balances. Shared controls. A complete transaction history.USDUS dollar account$184,250.00Operating balance↗KESKenyan shilling accountKSh 8,620,400Collections wallet↗EUREuro account€28,940.00Supplier payments↗Balance distribution3currenciesUSD · 65%KES · 25%EUR · 10%Identity checks connectedAccount access follows verification tiers.Illustrative balances · availability depends on market and provider scope
Resilience · illustrative operating context

How we engage.

Every engagement begins with named owners and a written scope. No bait-and-switch staffing — the engineer on your kickoff call is the engineer on your code. No ambiguity, no surprises, and every milestone produces an artefact you can audit.

  1. 01

    Scope & Kickoff

    We align on objectives, success criteria, and deliverables. Named engineers, realistic timelines, clear ownership — no ambiguity.

    What you get

    • Statement of work
    • Named owner roster
    • Milestone schedule
  2. 02

    Build & Iterate

    Weekly demos, transparent progress tracking, shared dashboards. Your engineers and ours operate as one team.

    What you get

    • Weekly demo recordings
    • Shared progress dashboard
    • Continuous code review
  3. 03

    Review & Assurance

    Code reviews, findings documentation, signed reports. Everything is reproducible and auditable.

    What you get

    • Signed engineering report
    • Findings + remediations
    • Reproducible test suite
  4. 04

    Handoff & Support

    Clean documentation, knowledge transfer, optional ongoing support — retainer or monitoring as needed.

    What you get

    • Runbooks + architecture docs
    • Team training
    • Optional retainer or monitoring

Have a brief that doesn’t fit a standard scope? We custom-build engagements for protocol teams, foundations, and institutions.

Propose a custom brief
WORK WITH A DEFINED OUTCOMETHE DETAILS THAT MATTER

Useful work leaves useful evidence.

A technical engagement should produce something your team can operate, review, and maintain after the handoff.

PRODUCT EXPERIENCEIllustrative data
mozacaWorkspace / ComplianceSample dataACYOUR WORKSPACEOverviewAccountsPaymentsTransactionsApprovalsReportsOPERATIONSDeveloper toolsSettingsAcme workspaceIDENTITY & POLICYConfidence, before approval.Demo caseACAcme TradingBusiness account · CASE-00284 · Standard reviewVerifiedBusiness identityDocuments reviewedVerified ✓Sanctions screeningReview result attachedClear ✓Transaction limitsConfigured by policyApplied ✓Payment approvalsSeparate maker and checkerEnabled ✓Evidence stays attached to the decision.Reviewer identity · timestamp · policy version · supporting documents · audit export
Built around the workflow.Designed for the operator. ↗
01

Implementation

Agree the scope, interfaces, acceptance criteria, integration tests, and operational handoff before delivery begins.

Code with a clear acceptance path
02

Security review

Define the system boundary, threat assumptions, review scope, findings format, and remediation verification.

Actionable findings and review evidence
03

Integration work

Map the upstream and downstream contracts, data ownership, failure modes, observability, and support responsibilities.

An integration your team can explain
How should we describe a technical brief?

Include the system or product, the outcome you need, what already exists, the critical dependencies, your preferred timeline, and the team that will own the result.

Can the engagement extend an existing product?

Product configuration, integration work, and deeper engineering changes should be separated during scoping so delivery effort and ownership are clear.

Get Started

Ready to build something durable?

Describe your project. Mozaca responds within 2 business days with scope, timeline, and next steps.